Save the Town Square

Town Square, not Times Square.

Every county is in the list below.

Loading the map…

Share of businesses whose owner address on file is in the same county

under 60%
60 to 64%
65 to 69%
70 to 74%
75% or more
too few to say

Owner key

Same county
Elsewhere in Texas
Out of state

Darker green: more owners nearby. Texas as a whole: 71%.

254 counties

Tap a county, or search for yours. Across Texas, 71% of businesses with a sales-tax permit list an owner address in their own county.

Source: Texas Comptroller, Nov 2026. Owner address on file.

County lines: U.S. Census Bureau.

All 254 counties, as a list

Anderson · 70% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 14/27) · new: 77% local (was 70%) · 2.1 trade workers per 1,000
Andrews · 71% local owners · 81% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 13/27) · new: 86% local (was 75%) · 6.6 trade workers per 1,000
Angelina · 71% local owners · 33% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 18/27) · new: 83% local (was 74%) · 3.5 trade workers per 1,000
Aransas · 68% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 17/27) · new: 78% local (was 74%) · 5.8 trade workers per 1,000
Archer · 70% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 3/27) · new: 90% local (was 73%) · 5.2 trade workers per 1,000
Armstrong · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · no chamber found · new: too few to say · 9.2 trade workers per 1,000
Atascosa · 62% local owners · 22% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 6/27) · new: 77% local (was 65%) · 5.3 trade workers per 1,000
Austin · 73% local owners · 59% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 16/27) · new: 79% local (was 80%) · 5.4 trade workers per 1,000
Bailey · 67% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 81% local (was 72%) · 3.3 trade workers per 1,000
Bandera · 76% local owners · 23% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 3/27) · new: 88% local (was 80%) · 8.8 trade workers per 1,000
Bastrop · 70% local owners · 73% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 15/27) · new: 78% local (was 72%) · 8.8 trade workers per 1,000
Baylor · 73% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 75% local (was 67%) · 5.5 trade workers per 1,000
Bee · 66% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 15/27) · new: 80% local (was 69%) · 1.8 trade workers per 1,000
Bell · 71% local owners · 40% of bank deposits in local banks · 9 chambers (best 14/27) · new: 81% local (was 77%) · 3.7 trade workers per 1,000
Bexar · 74% local owners · 43% of bank deposits in local banks · 11 chambers (best 17/27) · new: 86% local (was 80%) · 4.8 trade workers per 1,000
Blanco · 67% local owners · 33% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 10/27) · new: 73% local (was 67%) · 6.2 trade workers per 1,000
Borden · too few to say · no bank branch · no chamber found · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Bosque · 71% local owners · 80% of bank deposits in local banks · 5 chambers (best 12/27) · new: 80% local (was 75%) · 5.8 trade workers per 1,000
Bowie · 65% local owners · 19% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 6/27) · new: 81% local (was 72%) · 3.3 trade workers per 1,000
Brazoria · 65% local owners · 12% of bank deposits in local banks · 8 chambers (best 18/27) · new: 81% local (was 73%) · 5.2 trade workers per 1,000
Brazos · 69% local owners · 8% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 20/27) · new: 82% local (was 73%) · 3.1 trade workers per 1,000
Brewster · 73% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 70% local (was 63%) · 3.5 trade workers per 1,000
Briscoe · too few to say · 79% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Brooks · 54% local owners · 58% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 74% local (was 85%) · 2.4 trade workers per 1,000
Brown · 71% local owners · 34% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 82% local (was 71%) · 4.4 trade workers per 1,000
Burleson · 74% local owners · 80% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 2/27) · new: 85% local (was 82%) · 5.7 trade workers per 1,000
Burnet · 66% local owners · 14% of bank deposits in local banks · 5 chambers (best 8/27) · new: 74% local (was 70%) · 8.7 trade workers per 1,000
Caldwell · 67% local owners · 53% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 12/27) · new: 73% local (was 71%) · 9.1 trade workers per 1,000
Calhoun · 69% local owners · 52% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 78% local (was 66%) · 4.6 trade workers per 1,000
Callahan · 74% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers · new: 76% local (was 75%) · 7.7 trade workers per 1,000
Cameron · 79% local owners · 43% of bank deposits in local banks · 7 chambers (best 21/27) · new: 90% local (was 85%) · 2.4 trade workers per 1,000
Camp · 67% local owners · 59% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 70% local (was 69%) · 3.1 trade workers per 1,000
Carson · 67% local owners · 28% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 71% local (was 74%) · 4.7 trade workers per 1,000
Cass · 70% local owners · 57% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers · new: 81% local (was 82%) · 3.2 trade workers per 1,000
Castro · 70% local owners · 49% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 4/27) · new: 71% local (was 67%) · 2.1 trade workers per 1,000
Chambers · 58% local owners · 38% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 71% local (was 66%) · 3.9 trade workers per 1,000
Cherokee · 71% local owners · 67% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 15/27) · new: 80% local (was 75%) · 2.7 trade workers per 1,000
Childress · 62% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 9/27) · new: 62% local (was 62%) · 3.3 trade workers per 1,000
Clay · 70% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · no chamber found · new: 74% local (was 69%) · 2.9 trade workers per 1,000
Cochran · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Coke · 72% local owners · 63% of bank deposits in local banks · no chamber found · new: 69% local (was 83%) · 5.0 trade workers per 1,000
Coleman · 77% local owners · 65% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 4/27) · new: 87% local (was 66%) · 3.2 trade workers per 1,000
Collin · 67% local owners · 4% of bank deposits in local banks · 19 chambers (best 16/27) · new: 81% local (was 71%) · 2.5 trade workers per 1,000
Collingsworth · too few to say · 76% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · 7.6 trade workers per 1,000
Colorado · 69% local owners · 68% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 9/27) · new: 79% local (was 72%) · 4.3 trade workers per 1,000
Comal · 70% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 17/27) · new: 80% local (was 74%) · 6.2 trade workers per 1,000
Comanche · 77% local owners · 24% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 6/27) · new: 82% local (was 83%) · 2.8 trade workers per 1,000
Concho · too few to say · 100% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Cooke · 70% local owners · 79% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 17/27) · new: 78% local (was 71%) · 4.4 trade workers per 1,000
Coryell · 66% local owners · 16% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 14/27) · new: 79% local (was 72%) · 4.0 trade workers per 1,000
Cottle · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Crane · 64% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 70% local (was 65%) · trades: too few to say
Crockett · 67% local owners · 58% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 11/27) · new: 68% local (was 75%) · trades: too few to say
Crosby · 67% local owners · 43% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers · new: 74% local (was 70%) · 5.8 trade workers per 1,000
Culberson · 45% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 75% local (was 36%) · trades: too few to say
Dallam · 56% local owners · 30% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 15/27) · new: 54% local (was 68%) · 3.7 trade workers per 1,000
Dallas · 69% local owners · 12% of bank deposits in local banks · 34 chambers (best 19/27) · new: 78% local (was 72%) · 3.9 trade workers per 1,000
Dawson · 65% local owners · 60% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 80% local (was 61%) · 5.0 trade workers per 1,000
Deaf Smith · 65% local owners · 34% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 4/27) · new: 74% local (was 64%) · 2.4 trade workers per 1,000
Delta · 72% local owners · 58% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 2/27) · new: 75% local (was 76%) · 5.2 trade workers per 1,000
Denton · 68% local owners · 7% of bank deposits in local banks · 18 chambers (best 16/27) · new: 80% local (was 71%) · 3.0 trade workers per 1,000
DeWitt · 71% local owners · 45% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 13/27) · new: 84% local (was 69%) · 2.6 trade workers per 1,000
Dickens · too few to say · 100% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Dimmit · 53% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 76% local (was 61%) · 2.0 trade workers per 1,000
Donley · 73% local owners · 35% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 14/27) · new: 54% local (was 73%) · 5.0 trade workers per 1,000
Duval · 62% local owners · 46% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 87% local (was 71%) · 2.5 trade workers per 1,000
Eastland · 71% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 5 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 82% local (was 67%) · 4.2 trade workers per 1,000
Ector · 67% local owners · 11% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 13/27) · new: 83% local (was 75%) · 4.9 trade workers per 1,000
Edwards · too few to say · 100% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Ellis · 71% local owners · 49% of bank deposits in local banks · 9 chambers (best 19/27) · new: 82% local (was 77%) · 6.7 trade workers per 1,000
El Paso · 78% local owners · 24% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 12/27) · new: 91% local (was 86%) · 3.2 trade workers per 1,000
Erath · 71% local owners · 5% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 12/27) · new: 81% local (was 66%) · 4.7 trade workers per 1,000
Falls · 69% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 9/27) · new: 74% local (was 67%) · 2.3 trade workers per 1,000
Fannin · 73% local owners · 20% of bank deposits in local banks · 5 chambers (best 15/27) · new: 82% local (was 78%) · 6.0 trade workers per 1,000
Fayette · 67% local owners · 63% of bank deposits in local banks · 5 chambers (best 16/27) · new: 67% local (was 66%) · 6.4 trade workers per 1,000
Fisher · too few to say · 67% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · 5.7 trade workers per 1,000
Floyd · 75% local owners · 74% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 82% local (was 70%) · trades: too few to say
Foard · too few to say · 100% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Fort Bend · 72% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 15 chambers (best 18/27) · new: 83% local (was 76%) · 2.5 trade workers per 1,000
Franklin · 67% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 9/27) · new: 90% local (was 66%) · 3.3 trade workers per 1,000
Freestone · 71% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 82% local (was 72%) · 3.9 trade workers per 1,000
Frio · 54% local owners · 85% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 64% local (was 63%) · 2.5 trade workers per 1,000
Gaines · 79% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 10/27) · new: 86% local (was 80%) · 6.0 trade workers per 1,000
Galveston · 67% local owners · 40% of bank deposits in local banks · 12 chambers (best 17/27) · new: 81% local (was 72%) · 4.9 trade workers per 1,000
Garza · 69% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 12/27) · new: 76% local (was 62%) · trades: too few to say
Gillespie · 75% local owners · 32% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 80% local (was 76%) · 5.7 trade workers per 1,000
Glasscock · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · no chamber found · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Goliad · 75% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 13/27) · new: 80% local (was 73%) · 3.9 trade workers per 1,000
Gonzales · 68% local owners · 49% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 81% local (was 72%) · 3.9 trade workers per 1,000
Gray · 68% local owners · 3% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 78% local (was 78%) · 5.5 trade workers per 1,000
Grayson · 68% local owners · 5% of bank deposits in local banks · 9 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 79% local (was 74%) · 6.1 trade workers per 1,000
Gregg · 63% local owners · 43% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 18/27) · new: 77% local (was 72%) · 4.2 trade workers per 1,000
Grimes · 69% local owners · 55% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 12/27) · new: 82% local (was 74%) · 6.0 trade workers per 1,000
Guadalupe · 67% local owners · 27% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 16/27) · new: 78% local (was 67%) · 5.1 trade workers per 1,000
Hale · 68% local owners · 4% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 13/27) · new: 80% local (was 64%) · 3.0 trade workers per 1,000
Hall · too few to say · 66% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 8/27) · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Hamilton · 68% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 76% local (was 64%) · 4.6 trade workers per 1,000
Hansford · 78% local owners · 32% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 88% local (was 83%) · 5.1 trade workers per 1,000
Hardeman · 72% local owners · 32% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 88% local (was 70%) · trades: too few to say
Hardin · 71% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers · new: 80% local (was 75%) · 5.9 trade workers per 1,000
Harris · 74% local owners · 6% of bank deposits in local banks · 53 chambers (best 19/27) · new: 83% local (was 78%) · 3.9 trade workers per 1,000
Harrison · 67% local owners · 16% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 18/27) · new: 80% local (was 74%) · 1.9 trade workers per 1,000
Hartley · 54% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 15/27) · new: 67% local (was 72%) · trades: too few to say
Haskell · 61% local owners · 19% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 2/27) · new: 58% local (was 64%) · trades: too few to say
Hays · 64% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 7 chambers (best 19/27) · new: 76% local (was 68%) · 5.5 trade workers per 1,000
Hemphill · 80% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 88% local (was 81%) · 4.5 trade workers per 1,000
Henderson · 69% local owners · 42% of bank deposits in local banks · 7 chambers (best 4/27) · new: 81% local (was 67%) · 5.1 trade workers per 1,000
Hidalgo · 80% local owners · 27% of bank deposits in local banks · 15 chambers (best 18/27) · new: 91% local (was 88%) · 2.6 trade workers per 1,000
Hill · 64% local owners · 29% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 16/27) · new: 68% local (was 75%) · 4.7 trade workers per 1,000
Hockley · 71% local owners · 26% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 11/27) · new: 82% local (was 72%) · 5.4 trade workers per 1,000
Hood · 71% local owners · 45% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 15/27) · new: 80% local (was 72%) · 6.3 trade workers per 1,000
Hopkins · 72% local owners · 71% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 9/27) · new: 82% local (was 72%) · 2.9 trade workers per 1,000
Houston · 72% local owners · 30% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 82% local (was 70%) · 3.0 trade workers per 1,000
Howard · 64% local owners · 36% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 9/27) · new: 81% local (was 72%) · 4.0 trade workers per 1,000
Hudspeth · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Hunt · 66% local owners · 5% of bank deposits in local banks · 6 chambers (best 15/27) · new: 74% local (was 69%) · 6.1 trade workers per 1,000
Hutchinson · 69% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 6/27) · new: 81% local (was 82%) · 6.2 trade workers per 1,000
Irion · too few to say · 100% of bank deposits in local banks · no chamber found · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Jack · 68% local owners · 52% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 13/27) · new: 87% local (was 72%) · 4.6 trade workers per 1,000
Jackson · 72% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 9/27) · new: 84% local (was 71%) · 3.2 trade workers per 1,000
Jasper · 68% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 9/27) · new: 84% local (was 71%) · 4.8 trade workers per 1,000
Jeff Davis · 73% local owners · 100% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 4/27) · new: 86% local (was 58%) · trades: too few to say
Jefferson · 65% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 6 chambers (best 15/27) · new: 79% local (was 69%) · 3.5 trade workers per 1,000
Jim Hogg · 64% local owners · 69% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 75% local (was 50%) · trades: too few to say
Jim Wells · 65% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 79% local (was 69%) · 3.5 trade workers per 1,000
Johnson · 68% local owners · 18% of bank deposits in local banks · 9 chambers (best 15/27) · new: 81% local (was 74%) · 7.7 trade workers per 1,000
Jones · 69% local owners · 59% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 10/27) · new: 79% local (was 85%) · 2.2 trade workers per 1,000
Karnes · 56% local owners · 84% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 9/27) · new: 66% local (was 66%) · 2.7 trade workers per 1,000
Kaufman · 66% local owners · 46% of bank deposits in local banks · 5 chambers (best 18/27) · new: 79% local (was 72%) · 8.0 trade workers per 1,000
Kendall · 72% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 18/27) · new: 78% local (was 73%) · 6.0 trade workers per 1,000
Kenedy · too few to say · no bank branch · no chamber found · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Kent · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · no chamber found · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Kerr · 74% local owners · 10% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 19/27) · new: 84% local (was 74%) · 5.2 trade workers per 1,000
Kimble · 65% local owners · 100% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 82% local (was 79%) · 3.4 trade workers per 1,000
King · too few to say · no bank branch · no chamber found · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Kinney · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Kleberg · 61% local owners · 54% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 76% local (was 72%) · 3.3 trade workers per 1,000
Knox · 77% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 93% local (was 57%) · trades: too few to say
Lamar · 73% local owners · 65% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 16/27) · new: 80% local (was 78%) · 4.4 trade workers per 1,000
Lamb · 70% local owners · 14% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers · new: 70% local (was 52%) · 3.7 trade workers per 1,000
Lampasas · 73% local owners · 48% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 15/27) · new: 86% local (was 70%) · 10.7 trade workers per 1,000
La Salle · 57% local owners · 100% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 83% local (was 75%) · trades: too few to say
Lavaca · 78% local owners · 64% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 13/27) · new: 88% local (was 71%) · 5.7 trade workers per 1,000
Lee · 74% local owners · 39% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 11/27) · new: 77% local (was 75%) · 8.4 trade workers per 1,000
Leon · 71% local owners · 18% of bank deposits in local banks · 5 chambers (best 2/27) · new: 85% local (was 76%) · 5.0 trade workers per 1,000
Liberty · 66% local owners · 25% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 77% local (was 71%) · 5.7 trade workers per 1,000
Limestone · 64% local owners · 64% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 79% local (was 56%) · 3.1 trade workers per 1,000
Lipscomb · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Live Oak · 61% local owners · 57% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 8/27) · new: 67% local (was 60%) · 2.1 trade workers per 1,000
Llano · 68% local owners · 19% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 14/27) · new: 77% local (was 73%) · 7.0 trade workers per 1,000
Loving · too few to say · no bank branch · no chamber found · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Lubbock · 74% local owners · 28% of bank deposits in local banks · 5 chambers (best 14/27) · new: 85% local (was 76%) · 4.4 trade workers per 1,000
Lynn · 71% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 71% local (was 82%) · 5.0 trade workers per 1,000
Madison · 71% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 6/27) · new: 80% local (was 77%) · 4.6 trade workers per 1,000
Marion · 70% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 77% local (was 63%) · 2.1 trade workers per 1,000
Martin · 48% local owners · 80% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 52% local (was 67%) · 4.5 trade workers per 1,000
Mason · 74% local owners · 84% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 82% local (was 67%) · 6.3 trade workers per 1,000
Matagorda · 67% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 6/27) · new: 77% local (was 70%) · 3.8 trade workers per 1,000
Maverick · 77% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 7/27) · new: 89% local (was 87%) · 2.1 trade workers per 1,000
McCulloch · 64% local owners · 100% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 8/27) · new: 82% local (was 65%) · 3.2 trade workers per 1,000
McLennan · 72% local owners · 63% of bank deposits in local banks · 11 chambers (best 19/27) · new: 82% local (was 78%) · 4.2 trade workers per 1,000
McMullen · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · no chamber found · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Medina · 70% local owners · 61% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 10/27) · new: 80% local (was 78%) · 5.8 trade workers per 1,000
Menard · too few to say · 94% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 4/27) · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Midland · 67% local owners · 38% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 17/27) · new: 82% local (was 72%) · 4.8 trade workers per 1,000
Milam · 70% local owners · 97% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers · new: 76% local (was 74%) · 8.3 trade workers per 1,000
Mills · 78% local owners · 80% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 95% local (was 58%) · 3.5 trade workers per 1,000
Mitchell · 69% local owners · 71% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 80% local (was 84%) · 2.1 trade workers per 1,000
Montague · 76% local owners · 53% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 13/27) · new: 84% local (was 74%) · 6.3 trade workers per 1,000
Montgomery · 69% local owners · 22% of bank deposits in local banks · 6 chambers (best 16/27) · new: 82% local (was 73%) · 4.8 trade workers per 1,000
Moore · 65% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 83% local (was 78%) · 2.5 trade workers per 1,000
Morris · 66% local owners · 54% of bank deposits in local banks · 5 chambers · new: 89% local (was 75%) · 3.3 trade workers per 1,000
Motley · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Nacogdoches · 73% local owners · 31% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 17/27) · new: 86% local (was 75%) · 2.8 trade workers per 1,000
Navarro · 68% local owners · 45% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 10/27) · new: 79% local (was 73%) · 4.2 trade workers per 1,000
Newton · 70% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 0/27) · new: 82% local (was 80%) · 2.8 trade workers per 1,000
Nolan · 63% local owners · 16% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 13/27) · new: 74% local (was 65%) · 3.3 trade workers per 1,000
Nueces · 71% local owners · 10% of bank deposits in local banks · 6 chambers (best 21/27) · new: 85% local (was 77%) · 4.7 trade workers per 1,000
Ochiltree · 72% local owners · 53% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 82% local (was 72%) · 3.3 trade workers per 1,000
Oldham · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 13/27) · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Orange · 67% local owners · 23% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 9/27) · new: 81% local (was 73%) · 6.0 trade workers per 1,000
Palo Pinto · 65% local owners · 51% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 17/27) · new: 82% local (was 68%) · 5.0 trade workers per 1,000
Panola · 72% local owners · 67% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 80% local (was 72%) · 4.0 trade workers per 1,000
Parker · 73% local owners · 9% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 12/27) · new: 84% local (was 76%) · 7.2 trade workers per 1,000
Parmer · 68% local owners · 62% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 7/27) · new: 80% local (was 71%) · 2.2 trade workers per 1,000
Pecos · 60% local owners · 94% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 77% local (was 67%) · 2.3 trade workers per 1,000
Polk · 70% local owners · 90% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 12/27) · new: 82% local (was 76%) · 4.0 trade workers per 1,000
Potter · 61% local owners · 84% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 10/27) · new: 74% local (was 68%) · 5.3 trade workers per 1,000
Presidio · 76% local owners · 82% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 2/27) · new: 77% local (was 76%) · trades: too few to say
Rains · 71% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 81% local (was 66%) · 10.0 trade workers per 1,000
Randall · 71% local owners · 2% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers (best 10/27) · new: 80% local (was 75%) · 5.7 trade workers per 1,000
Reagan · 58% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 0/27) · new: 80% local (was 68%) · trades: too few to say
Real · 67% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 83% local (was 68%) · trades: too few to say
Red River · 74% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 12/27) · new: 88% local (was 75%) · 4.7 trade workers per 1,000
Reeves · 44% local owners · 53% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 60% local (was 46%) · 3.0 trade workers per 1,000
Refugio · 71% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 10/27) · new: 84% local (was 65%) · 2.7 trade workers per 1,000
Roberts · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Robertson · 71% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers · new: 78% local (was 61%) · 4.8 trade workers per 1,000
Rockwall · 68% local owners · 2% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 19/27) · new: 79% local (was 69%) · 9.1 trade workers per 1,000
Runnels · 76% local owners · 56% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 77% local (was 78%) · 3.1 trade workers per 1,000
Rusk · 71% local owners · 93% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 18/27) · new: 82% local (was 75%) · 2.5 trade workers per 1,000
Sabine · 70% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 9/27) · new: 76% local (was 66%) · 4.4 trade workers per 1,000
San Augustine · 68% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 82% local (was 88%) · 3.5 trade workers per 1,000
San Jacinto · 71% local owners · 86% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 10/27) · new: 75% local (was 78%) · 4.2 trade workers per 1,000
San Patricio · 62% local owners · 11% of bank deposits in local banks · 5 chambers (best 13/27) · new: 80% local (was 70%) · 4.4 trade workers per 1,000
San Saba · 79% local owners · 35% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 8/27) · new: 79% local (was 75%) · 2.8 trade workers per 1,000
Schleicher · too few to say · 100% of bank deposits in local banks · no chamber found · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Scurry · 71% local owners · 43% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 86% local (was 70%) · 1.3 trade workers per 1,000
Shackelford · 66% local owners · 74% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 58% local (was 37%) · trades: too few to say
Shelby · 76% local owners · 73% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 10/27) · new: 86% local (was 77%) · 2.9 trade workers per 1,000
Sherman · too few to say · 68% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Smith · 72% local owners · 44% of bank deposits in local banks · 7 chambers (best 14/27) · new: 80% local (was 74%) · 3.3 trade workers per 1,000
Somervell · 69% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 73% local (was 76%) · 4.1 trade workers per 1,000
Starr · 77% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 83% local (was 83%) · 1.6 trade workers per 1,000
Stephens · 73% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 76% local (was 80%) · 7.7 trade workers per 1,000
Sterling · too few to say · 100% of bank deposits in local banks · no chamber found · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Stonewall · too few to say · 100% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Sutton · 59% local owners · 75% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 6/27) · new: 65% local (was 76%) · trades: too few to say
Swisher · 70% local owners · 27% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 79% local (was 70%) · 2.8 trade workers per 1,000
Tarrant · 67% local owners · 12% of bank deposits in local banks · 25 chambers (best 22/27) · new: 79% local (was 74%) · 3.8 trade workers per 1,000
Taylor · 70% local owners · 65% of bank deposits in local banks · 3 chambers · new: 81% local (was 74%) · 5.1 trade workers per 1,000
Terrell · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · no chamber found · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Terry · 64% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 67% local (was 62%) · 4.8 trade workers per 1,000
Throckmorton · too few to say · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · no chamber found · new: too few to say · trades: too few to say
Titus · 67% local owners · 13% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 13/27) · new: 75% local (was 73%) · 3.5 trade workers per 1,000
Tom Green · 76% local owners · 11% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 15/27) · new: 83% local (was 80%) · 3.8 trade workers per 1,000
Travis · 72% local owners · 5% of bank deposits in local banks · 12 chambers (best 19/27) · new: 81% local (was 79%) · 3.1 trade workers per 1,000
Trinity · 74% local owners · 36% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 76% local (was 83%) · 3.2 trade workers per 1,000
Tyler · 67% local owners · 58% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 88% local (was 81%) · 4.3 trade workers per 1,000
Upshur · 75% local owners · 53% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 18/27) · new: 85% local (was 73%) · 3.4 trade workers per 1,000
Upton · 57% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · no chamber found · new: 75% local (was 73%) · trades: too few to say
Uvalde · 71% local owners · 93% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 11/27) · new: 87% local (was 83%) · 4.4 trade workers per 1,000
Val Verde · 71% local owners · 49% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 86% local (was 80%) · 3.5 trade workers per 1,000
Van Zandt · 67% local owners · 14% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 14/27) · new: 78% local (was 67%) · 6.4 trade workers per 1,000
Victoria · 71% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 10/27) · new: 82% local (was 76%) · 3.7 trade workers per 1,000
Walker · 67% local owners · 30% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 80% local (was 72%) · 2.9 trade workers per 1,000
Waller · 56% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 6 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 62% local (was 63%) · 5.0 trade workers per 1,000
Ward · 57% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 68% local (was 62%) · 3.2 trade workers per 1,000
Washington · 73% local owners · 23% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 15/27) · new: 79% local (was 69%) · 4.9 trade workers per 1,000
Webb · 80% local owners · 73% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 14/27) · new: 89% local (was 87%) · 1.7 trade workers per 1,000
Wharton · 73% local owners · 82% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 77% local (was 75%) · 3.9 trade workers per 1,000
Wheeler · 70% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 67% local (was 76%) · trades: too few to say
Wichita · 70% local owners · 55% of bank deposits in local banks · 5 chambers (best 9/27) · new: 83% local (was 74%) · 4.7 trade workers per 1,000
Wilbarger · 65% local owners · 65% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber (best 7/27) · new: 67% local (was 72%) · 2.8 trade workers per 1,000
Willacy · 67% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers · new: 72% local (was 80%) · 1.6 trade workers per 1,000
Williamson · 68% local owners · 12% of bank deposits in local banks · 9 chambers (best 17/27) · new: 82% local (was 71%) · 5.5 trade workers per 1,000
Wilson · 74% local owners · 6% of bank deposits in local banks · 4 chambers (best 0/27) · new: 82% local (was 80%) · 7.1 trade workers per 1,000
Winkler · 57% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 2/27) · new: 72% local (was 74%) · 4.9 trade workers per 1,000
Wise · 71% local owners · 9% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 11/27) · new: 82% local (was 76%) · 6.5 trade workers per 1,000
Wood · 74% local owners · 28% of bank deposits in local banks · 5 chambers (best 9/27) · new: 84% local (was 77%) · 4.4 trade workers per 1,000
Yoakum · 68% local owners · 0% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 7/27) · new: 72% local (was 66%) · 6.0 trade workers per 1,000
Young · 77% local owners · 65% of bank deposits in local banks · 2 chambers (best 8/27) · new: 78% local (was 76%) · 4.1 trade workers per 1,000
Zapata · 73% local owners · 96% of bank deposits in local banks · 1 chamber · new: 88% local (was 85%) · 1.2 trade workers per 1,000
Zavala · 71% local owners · 58% of bank deposits in local banks · no chamber found · new: 71% local (was 65%) · 2.2 trade workers per 1,000